<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sen. Smith Learns that Polygamy &#8800; Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>an unseemly mix of politics and Mormonism</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eTigg</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>eTigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>Well, like I said before, The Proclamation on the Family is "proof" only if you have the faith to see it.  If you don't, then it's just a list of good ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, like I said before, The Proclamation on the Family is &#8220;proof&#8221; only if you have the faith to see it.  If you don&#8217;t, then it&#8217;s just a list of good ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4447</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4447</guid>
		<description>Saying that children are entitled to a male father and female mother is not the same thing as proving that different-sex parents do a better job than same-sex parents. But now I am just repeating myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that children are entitled to a male father and female mother is not the same thing as proving that different-sex parents do a better job than same-sex parents. But now I am just repeating myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eTigg</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>eTigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4446</guid>
		<description>Sure it does.  God, through the First Presidency of the Church, says that children are entitled to be brought up by a man and a woman married to one another.  I am not saying anything against committed same-sex couples raising children, all I'm saying is that God prefers otherwise.  What more proof do you need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure it does.  God, through the First Presidency of the Church, says that children are entitled to be brought up by a man and a woman married to one another.  I am not saying anything against committed same-sex couples raising children, all I&#8217;m saying is that God prefers otherwise.  What more proof do you need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>I'm not arguing whether opposite-gender marriages are essential for salvation. What I am arguing is that there does not seem to be any evidence that different-gender couples are able to do a better job raising children. The quote you provided doesn't answer that question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not arguing whether opposite-gender marriages are essential for salvation. What I am arguing is that there does not seem to be any evidence that different-gender couples are able to do a better job raising children. The quote you provided doesn&#8217;t answer that question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eTigg</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4444</link>
		<dc:creator>eTigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4444</guid>
		<description>Sorry, David.  I meant to address that comment to Kim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, David.  I meant to address that comment to Kim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eTigg</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4443</link>
		<dc:creator>eTigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4443</guid>
		<description>"The family is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity."

David,  this is not stated as an ideal or hypothetical perfection.  This says that marriage *between a man and woman* "is essential..." (not "for the best" or "preferred"), and that children are "entitled" (way beyond "ought to be" or "supposed to be" or "we'd like it if") to birth within this kind of family.  Yes, one must have faith in God and in his living prophets to see the Proclamation on the Family as proof that "traditional" family units can do a better job raising children than same-sex couples.  That in no way weakens it as an element of proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The family is ordained of God. Marriage between man and woman is essential to His eternal plan. Children are entitled to birth within the bonds of matrimony, and to be reared by a father and a mother who honor marital vows with complete fidelity.&#8221;</p>
<p>David,  this is not stated as an ideal or hypothetical perfection.  This says that marriage *between a man and woman* &#8220;is essential&#8230;&#8221; (not &#8220;for the best&#8221; or &#8220;preferred&#8221;), and that children are &#8220;entitled&#8221; (way beyond &#8220;ought to be&#8221; or &#8220;supposed to be&#8221; or &#8220;we&#8217;d like it if&#8221;) to birth within this kind of family.  Yes, one must have faith in God and in his living prophets to see the Proclamation on the Family as proof that &#8220;traditional&#8221; family units can do a better job raising children than same-sex couples.  That in no way weakens it as an element of proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 04:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>Sorry, David. What I meant was sure I believe the ideal is for every child to have a mother and a father. I just realised it looks like I said I sure do reject that ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, David. What I meant was sure I believe the ideal is for every child to have a mother and a father. I just realised it looks like I said I sure do reject that ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>Or rather "it does not empirically state..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or rather &#8220;it does not empirically state&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>The proclamation on the family has stated an ideal. It does not state that empirically different-sex couples are better at raising children than same-sex couples. It is not a proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proclamation on the family has stated an ideal. It does not state that empirically different-sex couples are better at raising children than same-sex couples. It is not a proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eTigg</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/06/18/sen-smith-learns-that-polygamy-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4436</link>
		<dc:creator>eTigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1205#comment-4436</guid>
		<description>Kim, you're right...well, you're right if you mean other than the Proclamation on the Family.  I don't need more proof than that, if you might.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim, you&#8217;re right&#8230;well, you&#8217;re right if you mean other than the Proclamation on the Family.  I don&#8217;t need more proof than that, if you might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
