<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For those who dismiss slippery slope arguments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/05/15/for-those-who-dismiss-slippery-slope-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/05/15/for-those-who-dismiss-slippery-slope-arguments/</link>
	<description>an unseemly mix of politics and Mormonism</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David H. Sundwall</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/05/15/for-those-who-dismiss-slippery-slope-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Sundwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1163#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>Chris - 

I thought Volokh was effective in contrasting statements advocating incremental same-sex rights laws that claimed they weren't going to lead to SSM against the SSM decisions which cited those very same laws as part of the justification.  There sure seems to be some causality in this case.

That's weird about your newfound anonymity.  OpenID works for others on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris - </p>
<p>I thought Volokh was effective in contrasting statements advocating incremental same-sex rights laws that claimed they weren&#8217;t going to lead to SSM against the SSM decisions which cited those very same laws as part of the justification.  There sure seems to be some causality in this case.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s weird about your newfound anonymity.  OpenID works for others on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/05/15/for-those-who-dismiss-slippery-slope-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1163#comment-4283</guid>
		<description>I am not sure why it is putting me as Anonymous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure why it is putting me as Anonymous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/05/15/for-those-who-dismiss-slippery-slope-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4282</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1163#comment-4282</guid>
		<description>That slippery slope arguments sometimes turn out to be true does not make them good arguments. There is always a certain element of truth to them, much in the way that stereotypes consist of some true elemnts. One of the problem with slippery slope arguments is that they often assume a causal relationship between the chain of events. There rarely is such a relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That slippery slope arguments sometimes turn out to be true does not make them good arguments. There is always a certain element of truth to them, much in the way that stereotypes consist of some true elemnts. One of the problem with slippery slope arguments is that they often assume a causal relationship between the chain of events. There rarely is such a relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
