<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mormon Ecumenism On Both Sides of California Same-sex Marriage Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/</link>
	<description>Latter-day Saints in the public square</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 06:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: As goes California . . . &#124; A Soft Answer</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-4270</link>
		<dc:creator>As goes California . . . &#124; A Soft Answer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-4270</guid>
		<description>[...] state interest in preserving marriage as only between a man and a woman. Opinion here [PDF]. The LDS Church took part in arguments to prevent this kind of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] state interest in preserving marriage as only between a man and a woman. Opinion here [PDF]. The LDS Church took part in arguments to prevent this kind of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Sundwall</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Sundwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>Like Chris said, Starr does a lot of work as a con law attorney (I think he is/was at Pepperdine), but he's obviously best known for the infamous Starr report (whatever your opinion of it is) and being thoroughly trashed by the Clinton administration.  

I know you now see the link Nick, but just for anyone else, the end was edited so that the brief's link is now the first in the second to last paragraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Chris said, Starr does a lot of work as a con law attorney (I think he is/was at Pepperdine), but he&#8217;s obviously best known for the infamous Starr report (whatever your opinion of it is) and being thoroughly trashed by the Clinton administration.  </p>
<p>I know you now see the link Nick, but just for anyone else, the end was edited so that the brief&#8217;s link is now the first in the second to last paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Literski</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Literski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>You're absolutely right, Chris.  Still, I'm a bit surprised to see the LDS church associate itself with Starr on this.  Note that the brief is co-authored by Starr and an attorney from Kirton &#38; McConkie, the firm that generally represents the LDS church in litigation.

I can't help but wonder how many thousands of dollars in tithing went to legal fees for this, all because LDS leaders wish to foist their own religious code of conduct onto members of a pluralistic society who are not in any way answerable to the LDS church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, Chris.  Still, I&#8217;m a bit surprised to see the LDS church associate itself with Starr on this.  Note that the brief is co-authored by Starr and an attorney from Kirton &amp; McConkie, the firm that generally represents the LDS church in litigation.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but wonder how many thousands of dollars in tithing went to legal fees for this, all because LDS leaders wish to foist their own religious code of conduct onto members of a pluralistic society who are not in any way answerable to the LDS church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Literski</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Literski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>Thanks, David.  I saw afterward that the pro-marriage-equality religious groups were in the same brief as Affirmation, et al.  Again, thanks for posting this!

As for Kenneth Star, the man was a pornography peddler, and his report was the biggest piece of porn ever sold by Deseret Book (yes, they did sell it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, David.  I saw afterward that the pro-marriage-equality religious groups were in the same brief as Affirmation, et al.  Again, thanks for posting this!</p>
<p>As for Kenneth Star, the man was a pornography peddler, and his report was the biggest piece of porn ever sold by Deseret Book (yes, they did sell it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H.</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>Starr is a pretty famous and respected appellate attorney. This is the case whether we agree about impeachment or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starr is a pretty famous and respected appellate attorney. This is the case whether we agree about impeachment or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Sundwall</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Sundwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>Nick,

I don't call them "dissident groups," the SF Chronicle did.  

I used the quotes to make that clear I thought.

The last link is to the brief you are asking about.  Sorry that wasn't clear.  I'll edit that.

The CA Supreme Court has a special page for the case, &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/" rel="nofollow"&gt;In re Marriage Cases&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, with all the briefs and filings.

I imagine the article emphasized Starr's participation to make that point to those who didn't like the impeachment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t call them &#8220;dissident groups,&#8221; the SF Chronicle did.  </p>
<p>I used the quotes to make that clear I thought.</p>
<p>The last link is to the brief you are asking about.  Sorry that wasn&#8217;t clear.  I&#8217;ll edit that.</p>
<p>The CA Supreme Court has a special page for the case, <em><a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.courtinfo.ca.gov');" rel="nofollow">In re Marriage Cases</a></em>, with all the briefs and filings.</p>
<p>I imagine the article emphasized Starr&#8217;s participation to make that point to those who didn&#8217;t like the impeachment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H.</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3501</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3501</guid>
		<description>As a political philosopher with Con Law interestests this issues is very interesting to me. As a member of the Church, I avoid any debate about it because I am not sure where to stand on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a political philosopher with Con Law interestests this issues is very interesting to me. As a member of the Church, I avoid any debate about it because I am not sure where to stand on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Literski</title>
		<link>http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Literski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/2008/02/19/mormon-ecumenism-on-both-sides-of-california-same-sex-marriage-debate/#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting these links!  I wish that the LDS church wouldn't have dirtied its hands by associating with the likes of Kenneth Starr.

Is there a link for the brief from these "dissident groups," as you call them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting these links!  I wish that the LDS church wouldn&#8217;t have dirtied its hands by associating with the likes of Kenneth Starr.</p>
<p>Is there a link for the brief from these &#8220;dissident groups,&#8221; as you call them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
