If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Especially if you came from Mormon Archipelago as it only includes my major article posts.
Thanks for visiting!
The NY Times Magazine article on Gov. Huckabee is online. When I first saw the headlines last night (”Huckabee asks if Mormons believe Jesus, Satan are brothers“) I thought it was an Onion headline or an out-of-context jab by the media to keep the GOP Holy War stoked after last week’s speech.
Even Huckabee’s campaign claims it was taken out of context. But nothing on the substance of what he actually said. How does a question like that even have a context?
But the context doesn’t help after reviewing the NY Times (emphasis added, thanks EfM).
Huckabee is, indeed, a discreet fellow, but he has no trouble making his feelings known. He mentioned how much he respected his fellow candidates John McCain and Rudolph W. Giuliani. The name of his principal rival in Iowa, Mitt Romney, went unmentioned. Romney, a Mormon, had promised that he would be addressing the subject of his religion a few days later. I asked Huckabee, who describes himself as the only Republican candidate with a degree in theology, if he considered Mormonism a cult or a religion. ‘‘I think it’s a religion,’’ he said. ‘‘I really don’t know much about it.’’
I was about to jot down this piece of boilerplate when Huckabee surprised me with a question of his own: ‘‘Don’t Mormons,’’ he asked in an innocent voice, ‘‘believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?’’
This further confirms Krauthammer’s point that Huckabee wants to have it both ways on the Mormonism issue. He refuses to answer questions if it’s a cult, Christian, or even politically relevant. All he has to do is raise them. (The religion editor for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette is helpfully blogging that the AP got the story wrong and that Huckabee is right.) As a Southern Baptist minister, Huckabee knows full well what he’s doing by merely “asking” hot button questions among anti-Mormons.
Other points:
I appreciated the Church’s pushback when asked for comment.
A spokeswoman for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said Huckabee’s question is usually raised by those who wish to smear the Mormon faith rather than clarify doctrine.
Say what you will about Rep. Tancredo, but at least he condemns anti-Mormon politics (thanks Article VI).
Tags: anti-mormon, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://www.asoftanswer.com/2007/12/12/huckabees-innocent-question/trackback/
18 June 2008 at 2:25 pm
Pingback from Huckabee: don’t demonize Obama, Romney OK | A Soft Answer
13 December 2007 at 11:24 am
Chris H.
If Huckabee is the nominee, what will you do? I assume that most Mormons will still vote for him since they have a deep commitment to the GOP as an institution.
13 December 2007 at 12:24 pm
David H. Sundwall
Oooh! That’s a toughie.
I could shirk the question because I think and hope Huckabee is a one-note politician who may win Iowa but I don’t think he’ll go too far.
I think the establishment and conservative punditry are pretty much aligning against him. Hopefully the base will follow suit.
So I seriously doubt I’ll have to actually face that question. I don’t believe in third-party candidates and the Democrats have absolutely nothing for me.
But, yes I probably would vote for him. He has fallen to the bottom of my list of the viable candidates though.
13 December 2007 at 12:32 pm
Chris H.
Of course, being from Maryland, it does not really matter whether you vote for the GOP nominee or not. The state will easily go for Clinton or Obama. A a liberal in Idaho, the same goes for me: my vote does not matter. Yet, we still take pride in how we vote as a matter of principle.
Do not underestimate Huckabee, if he wins Iowa, he may be hard to stop in SC and elsewhere. Romney will be in trouble, not for losing Iowa, but for losing his dominance in Iowa. Doubt about the strength of a candidate is lethal in primary politics. Mitt could be the Howard Dean of 2008. The similarities are strong.
BTW, Mitt on illegal immigration has turn me against him even more.
13 December 2007 at 12:53 pm
David H. Sundwall
That’s true.
Being in Maryland, and even worse, Montgomery County, leaves a conservative Republican wondering what’s the point in democracy sometimes.
But it give me empathy for my liberal brethren in Utah and Idaho.
You’re right to not underestimate Huckabee but I’m hoping the tide is starting to turn on him. But it may be too late with Christmas fast upon us and then Iowa. So you’re point is well taken.
I think Mitt’s take on immigration hasn’t been handled very well but I don’t have a problem with it. I think it’s a good starting point to bargain a real immigration reform that will have to include some kind of legalization but tough on borders and employers. The McCain/Bush plan this year was unrealistic and weak.